Login
Register
Complete Your Profile
Change Password
Request a Password Reset
Download Documents
Download Documents
Get Help to Participate in This Tender
Change Password
For better security, update the account password.
Home » Blog » Computer Hardware and Software Services
16 Oct 2026| Posted by John | In Computer Hardware and Software Services
Bundesrechenzentrum BRZ, the Austrian federal government's central IT service provider, has awarded a contract to EBCONT proconsult for subscriptions to Elastic standard software. The contract is worth EUR 64,600 and was awarded as a call-off from an existing framework agreement. Only one tender was received, and the contract was concluded on 8 October 2026. The software supports the security analytics and search capabilities that underpin parts of Austria's public sector IT infrastructure.
Elastic is one of the most widely deployed open-source search and analytics platforms in the world. Its core products, including Elasticsearch, Logstash and Kibana, are used by governments, banks, telecommunications operators and technology companies to search, analyse and visualise large volumes of data. In a security context, Elastic is often used for log management, security information and event management, and threat detection, because it can ingest and correlate data from many different sources at speed.
The Bundesrechenzentrum BRZ is the central IT service provider for the Austrian federal government. It operates and secures the systems that support federal ministries, agencies and public bodies, and it handles a wide range of digital government services. Its procurement of Elastic software reflects the role that search and analytics platforms play in modern public sector security operations. The contract for these subscriptions has now been awarded to EBCONT proconsult.
This contract matters because it supports the security analytics capability of Austria's central government IT provider. The BRZ operates systems that hold sensitive public data and support critical government functions, and it must be able to detect, investigate and respond to security incidents. Elastic software is one of the tools that makes that possible, by allowing security teams to search and analyse large volumes of log and event data.
It also matters because of how it was procured. The contract was awarded as a call-off from an existing framework agreement, rather than through a standalone competition. Framework call-offs are a common and efficient way for public bodies to buy software, because the commercial terms have already been negotiated and the administrative burden is reduced. In this case, the award criterion was price, applied under the terms of the framework, and only one tender was received.
The contract also matters because of its modest value. At EUR 64,600, this is a small contract, and it is typical of the incremental licence and subscription purchases that make up a large share of public sector software spending. Rather than buying everything at once, the BRZ has procured the Elastic subscriptions it needs under the framework, and further call-offs may follow as requirements grow. Suppliers watching this market should note that small contracts like this can be the building blocks of a much larger, long-term software estate.
The contract covers subscriptions to standard software from the manufacturer Elastic. It is classified as a supplies contract, under CPV 48000000 (software package and computer systems). It is a single-lot procurement, identified as LOT-0001, with the internal identifier 3601.04772.
The place of performance is Wien (AT130), Austria. The value of all contracts awarded in the notice is EUR 64,600, which was also the value of the winning tender. The notice does not disclose an estimated value, so it is not possible to compare the awarded value with the buyer's pre-tender estimate.
The procurement was conducted as an open procedure under Directive 2014/24/EU. However, the contract itself was awarded as a call-off from an existing framework agreement, created by notice 698415-2026. The award criterion was price, weighted at 100%, applied under the terms of the framework agreement. The contract is not financed with EU funds and is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement.
| Notice ID | 718018-2026 |
| OJ S issue | 201/2026 |
| Publication date | 16 October 2026 |
| Contracting authority | Bundesrechenzentrum BRZ |
| Contract type | Supplies |
| Main CPV code | 48000000 – Software package and information systems |
| Procedure type | Open procedure, awarded as a call-off from a framework agreement |
| Legal basis | Directive 2014/24/EU |
| Lot | LOT-0001 |
| Winner | EBCONT proconsult |
| Winning bid | EUR 64,600.00 |
| Number of bids | 1 |
| Award criterion | Price – 100%, under the terms of the framework agreement |
| Framework agreement | Yes – call-off under framework, partly without reopening and partly with reopening of competition |
| Framework notice | 698415-2026 |
| EU funding | No |
| GPA covered | Yes |
| Subcontracting | Not yet known |
| Review body | Bundesverwaltungsgericht |
The scope is the supply of subscriptions to standard software from Elastic. The notice describes the subject in German as "Subscriptions über Standardsoftware des Herstellers Elastic, 4559914." It is a subscription purchase, not a perpetual licence, which means the BRZ is paying for access to the software for a defined period rather than buying it outright.
Elastic software is typically used for search, logging, analytics and security operations. In a public sector context, it can support log management, security monitoring, threat detection, application performance monitoring and data visualisation. The BRZ, as the central IT provider for the Austrian federal government, is likely to use Elastic in one or more of these roles.
The notice does not disclose which specific Elastic products are covered, how many subscriptions are involved, the subscription period or the technical environment in which the software will be deployed. Those details would be in the framework documents and the call-off contract, which are not included in the TED notice. The contracting authority has not disclosed this information.
The notice also does not disclose whether the contract includes support, training or implementation services alongside the subscriptions. The winning bidder declared subcontracting as "not yet known," which suggests the delivery arrangements were still being finalised at the time of the notice. The contracting authority has not disclosed further details.
The buyer is the Bundesrechenzentrum BRZ, the Austrian Federal Computing Centre. It is classified as a public undertaking controlled by a central government authority, with economic affairs as its main activity. Its registration number is ATU41542700, and its address is Hintere Zollamtsstraße 4, Wien, postcode 1030, in the Wien NUTS region (AT130). Its email address is [email protected], and its website is brz.gv.at.
The BRZ is the central IT service provider for the Austrian federal government. It operates and secures the IT systems that support federal ministries, agencies and public bodies, and it delivers a wide range of digital government services. Its role in this procurement is as buyer and manager of the contract.
The BRZ is a significant buyer of software and IT services in Austria. Its procurement activity covers infrastructure, applications, security, cloud services and licensing, and it operates within the framework of EU and Austrian public procurement rules. The use of framework agreements for software licensing is a common feature of its procurement practice.
Bundesrechenzentrum BRZ
The BRZ is the contracting authority. It is Austria's central government IT service provider, responsible for operating and securing federal IT systems. Its role in this procurement is as buyer and manager of the contract.
It is registered in Wien, with registration number ATU41542700. It operates the systems that support Austrian federal government functions, and it procures the software and services needed to keep those systems running and secure. The Elastic subscriptions procured under this contract will support its security and analytics capabilities.
EBCONT proconsult
EBCONT proconsult is the winning bidder. It is classified as a medium-sized economic operator. Its registration number is ATU68126645, and its address is Bergmanngasse 7, Neulengbach, postcode 3040, in the Sankt Pölten NUTS region (AT123). Its email address is [email protected], and its telephone number is +43 (664) 60651549.
EBCONT is an Austrian IT services company that provides consulting, software licensing and technology services to public and private sector clients. It submitted the only tender for LOT-0001, valued at EUR 64,600, and declared subcontracting as "not yet known."
Its role is as tenderer and winner of LOT-0001. It will supply the Elastic subscriptions to the BRZ under the terms of the framework agreement. The notice does not disclose whether EBCONT is an authorised Elastic partner, or how it will deliver the subscriptions. The contracting authority has not disclosed this information.
Bundesverwaltungsgericht
The Bundesverwaltungsgericht, the Austrian Federal Administrative Court, is listed as the review organisation and the organisation providing more information on review procedures. Its registration number is 9110008059823, and its address is Erdbergstraße 192-196, Wien, postcode 1030. Its email address is [email protected], and its telephone number is +43 1 60 149-0.
Its role is to hear appeals from suppliers who believe a procurement has been conducted improperly. No complaints were recorded in this procurement.
Other organisations
The notice does not list any other tenderers, consortium members, framework participants or subcontractors. Only one tender was received, from EBCONT proconsult. No other organisation materially affects the understanding of this award.
The procurement was structured as an open procedure, but the contract itself was awarded as a call-off from an existing framework agreement. That two-layer structure is common in public sector software procurement. The framework establishes the commercial terms, the supplier panel and the conditions under which call-offs are made. The call-off then applies those terms to a specific purchase, in this case the Elastic subscriptions.
The award criterion for the call-off was price, weighted at 100%, applied under the terms of the framework agreement. The notice states clearly that the award was made according to the conditions laid down in the framework. In a call-off, the award criterion serves mainly to document the basis on which the purchase was made, rather than to compare competing offers, unless the framework requires a mini-competition. The notice does not disclose whether a mini-competition took place.
Only one tender was received, from EBCONT proconsult, and no SMEs participated. That is consistent with a call-off under a framework where the supplier panel is already fixed. In such arrangements, the number of potential bidders is limited to the framework participants, and if the framework is structured as a direct call-off without reopening of competition, the award may go to a single supplier. The framework type is recorded as partly without reopening and partly with reopening of competition, so the position depends on which part of the framework this call-off falls under.
The market for Elastic software and related services in the Austrian public sector is specialised. Elastic is a specific vendor, and its products are typically supplied through authorised partners and resellers. That limits the field of potential suppliers to those with the relevant vendor relationships, which explains why only one tender was received and why no SMEs participated.
Framework agreements are the standard route for public sector software licensing in Austria and across the EU. They allow buyers to establish supplier panels and commercial terms in advance, and then call off specific purchases as needs arise. For suppliers, being on the right framework is often a precondition for winning individual contracts. For buyers, frameworks reduce administrative burden and provide a predictable route to market.
This contract reflects those dynamics. The BRZ used a framework agreement to procure Elastic subscriptions, and the call-off was awarded to EBCONT proconsult. The contract value is modest, but the pattern is significant: public sector software spending is increasingly channelled through frameworks, and the suppliers that secure framework positions capture the call-offs that follow. The notice does not disclose whether the framework includes multiple suppliers or how competition works within it, but the structure is consistent with the way large public sector software estates are managed.
At EUR 64,600, this contract is small in absolute terms. It is a subscription purchase, not a major systems integration project, and its economic significance lies mainly in what it supports: the security and analytics capability of Austria's central government IT provider.
The contract also has a direct economic effect. The money flows to EBCONT proconsult, an Austrian medium-sized enterprise, and through it to the software vendor. Because the contract was awarded within Austria and to an Austrian supplier, a significant share of the economic benefit is retained domestically. That is a positive outcome from a regional perspective, though the ultimate beneficiary is the Elastic vendor.
The wider economic significance lies in the cumulative effect of contracts like this. Public sector software estates are built through many small purchases, and each call-off adds to the capability of the systems that support government. The BRZ's Elastic subscriptions are part of that larger investment in public sector digital infrastructure.
The most immediate future opportunity is further call-offs under the same framework. If the BRZ needs additional Elastic subscriptions, it can procure them under the framework rather than running a new competition. Suppliers on the framework, and in particular EBCONT proconsult, are well positioned to capture those call-offs.
There may also be opportunities arising from the expiry of the current subscriptions. Subscription-based software requires renewal, and the renewal of these Elastic subscriptions would be a future procurement event. Suppliers should monitor the BRZ's procurement activity as the subscription period ends.
More broadly, the BRZ's software estate covers a wide range of vendors and technologies beyond Elastic. Suppliers with capability in search, analytics, security and related areas should monitor the BRZ's framework agreements and call-off notices for opportunities. Framework agreements are often the route through which those opportunities arise, so being on the right framework matters.
This contract represents a broader pattern in public sector software procurement: small call-offs under large frameworks. The BRZ did not run a standalone competition for Elastic subscriptions. It used an existing framework, applied the pre-agreed terms and awarded the call-off to a single supplier. That is efficient for the buyer and predictable for the supplier, but it also means that the competitive moment happened earlier, when the framework itself was awarded. Suppliers that miss the framework competition will not get a second chance at the call-off stage.
The award is strategically important because it supports the security and analytics capability of Austria's central government IT provider. Elastic software is used for search, logging and security operations, and the BRZ's ability to detect and investigate incidents depends on tools of this kind. The contract is small, but it is part of a much larger software estate that underpins federal government IT.
Suppliers can learn several things from this procurement. First, frameworks matter. Being on the right framework is often the only way to compete for call-offs, and framework positions are won through competitive procedures. Second, vendor specialisation matters. Elastic is a specific product, and only suppliers with the relevant vendor relationships can supply it. Third, small contracts build large estates. Individual call-offs may be modest in value, but they accumulate into significant long-term revenue. Fourth, direct call-offs limit competition. If the framework allows call-offs without reopening competition, the award may go to a single supplier without a fresh price test. Fifth, data quality matters. The notice contains a minor inconsistency in the statistical data, recording one tender overall while separately recording zero electronic submissions, which suppliers should note when analysing the outcome.
Suppliers should position themselves accordingly. Elastic partners and resellers should ensure they are on the relevant frameworks, because that is where the call-offs flow. Software vendors and integrators should monitor the BRZ's framework activity for opportunities in adjacent technology areas. Subscription-based software suppliers should plan for renewals, because renewals are recurring procurement events that generate repeat revenue. And all suppliers should monitor the BRZ's published notices, because the framework route means that opportunities can appear with little advance notice.
Austria's central government IT provider has procured Elastic software subscriptions through a call-off under an existing framework agreement. The contract, worth EUR 64,600, was awarded to EBCONT proconsult after a single tender was received. It supports the search, analytics and security capabilities that underpin parts of the federal government's IT estate.
The contract is small, but it illustrates how public sector software procurement increasingly works: frameworks establish the supplier panel and commercial terms, and call-offs deliver the individual purchases. For suppliers, the lesson is that framework positions matter, vendor relationships matter, and small contracts accumulate into significant long-term revenue. The notice leaves some questions unanswered, including the specific Elastic products and the subscription period, but the core award is clear: EBCONT proconsult will supply the subscriptions, and the BRZ will use them to support its security and analytics operations.
Source: Tenders Electronic Daily (TED), Contract Award Notice 718018-2026, Official Journal of the European Union, OJ S 201/2026, published on 16 October 2026.
Q1. What is the official contracting authority and total awarded contract value for the security software procurement under TED notice 718018-2026 in Austria?
The procurement was managed by Bundesrechenzentrum BRZ in Vienna, Austria, with a final awarded contract value of EUR 64,600.00 as detailed on TendersOnTime under TED notice 718018-2026.
Q2. Which company won the contract for the Elastic standard software subscriptions under TED notice 718018-2026?
EBCONT proconsult based in Neulengbach, Austria, secured the contract as reported by TendersOnTime.
Q3. What is the specific scope of work and classification under CPV 48000000 for the Bundesrechenzentrum BRZ?
The scope covers software packages, information systems, and standard subscriptions to Elastic manufacturer software to support security logging and analytics as highlighted on TendersOnTime under TED notice 718018-2026.
Q4. Why was a framework call-off procedure utilized by the Austrian Federal Computing Centre for this software contract?
The contract was awarded as a call-off from an existing framework agreement (notice 698415-2026), allowing efficient procurement without a standalone open competition as analyzed on TendersOnTime.
Q5. What award criteria and weighting were established to assess bids under TED notice 718018-2026?
The award criterion was price, weighted at a full 100%, applied under the pre-negotiated terms of the framework agreement as analyzed on TendersOnTime.
Q6. What review organization handles public procurement disputes and appeals in Vienna, Austria?
Appeals are handled by Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Austrian Federal Administrative Court) as noted in procurement files reviewed by TendersOnTime.
Q7. How can international software suppliers participate in Austrian public eprocurement frameworks covered by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA)?
Suppliers can leverage centralized public IT channels and track upcoming software opportunities using intelligence platforms such as TendersOnTime.
Q8. How many total tenders were received by the contracting authority for the Elastic software call-off?
A single tender was received from EBCONT proconsult, reflecting the specialized sole-source partner structure typical of vendor-specific software frameworks, as reviewed on TendersOnTime.
Q9. Which organization facilitated the electronic transmission of contract award notice 718018-2026 for the Bundesrechenzentrum?
The Publications Office of the European Union acted as the TED eSender hub for official publication as reviewed on TendersOnTime.