Service Alliance for Track Sections 2, 3 and 4 Tender - 137560240

The THE FINNISH RAILWAYS AGENCY has issued a Tender notice for the procurement of a Service Alliance for Track Sections 2, 3 and 4 of the Ertms Program, Commissioning Inspection Procurement in the Finland. This Tender notice was published on 11 Mar 2026 and is scheduled to close on 16 Apr 2026, with an estimated Tender value of EUR 25000000. Interested bidders can access detailed Tender information, eligibility criteria, and complete bidding documents by referencing TOT Ref No. 137560240, while the tender notice number is 169560-2026 and Registering on the platform.

Expired Tender

Procurement Summary

Country: Finland

Summary: Service Alliance for Track Sections 2, 3 and 4 of the Ertms Program, Commissioning Inspection Procurement

Deadline: 16 Apr 2026

Posting Date: 11 Mar 2026

Other Information

Notice Type: Tender

TOT Ref.No.: 137560240

Document Ref. No.: 169560-2026

Competition: ICB

Financier: Self Financed

Purchaser Ownership: Public

Tender Value: EUR 25000000

CPV Classification

71000000 - Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services

Purchaser's Detail

Name: Login to see tender_details

Address: Login to see tender_details

Email: Login to see tender_detailsLogin to see details

Tender Details

The subject of this procurement is the tasks related to the commissioning inspection of the ERTMS program in track sections 2, 3 and 4. The ERTMS program includes the safety device systems of the entire Finnish rail network (about 6000 km) and the current train traffic control system (JKV). replacement. The service under procurement is part of the service alliance of track sections 2, 3 and 4 of the ERTMS program. The alliance is made up of the Client and the service providers responsible for construction consulting who are tendered as parties, as well as the separately tendered design and commissioning inspection parties. This is a service procurement that exceeds the EU threshold. The procurement is carried out through an open procedure. The workloads of the procurement target are divided in order of merit so that the best Total Points in the offer comparison the winning bidder receives 60-70% of the commissioning inspection assignment (the realized value of the entire commissioning inspection assignment in euros), the second highest scorer wins 30-40% of the commissioning inspection assignment. The right level of workload distribution is ensured by annual monitoring of the implementation of work volumes. In the more detailed division of work, the principle of "for the best of the project" is followed. The content of the procurement is described in more detail in the request for tenders and its appendices, as well as in the contract. of track sections 2, 3 and 4 of the ERTMS program service alliance, commissioning inspection procurement The subject of this procurement is the tasks related to the commissioning inspection of the ERTMS program in track sections 2, 3 and 4. The ERTMS program includes the entire Finnish rail network (about 6000 km...
Document Type: Contract Notice Reference Number: VÄYLÄ/1829/Yv-02.01.12/2026 Contract Type: services Estimated Value: 25000000 - EUR Authority Type: body-pl-cga Doc Title: Service alliance of track sections 2, 3 and 4 of the ERTMS program, commissioning inspection procurement Dispatch Date: 2026-03-10 Publish Date: 2026-03-11 Submission Date: 2026-04-16

Documents

 Tender Notice


Corresponding Contract Award Notice

No Contract Award Notice found for this tender. Please try using the Contract Award Search Page.


Similar Tenders

Request Demo
GiZ Tenders India

Procurement Documents for Finland

Access a comprehensive library of standard procurement documents specific to Finland. Here, you'll find all the essential forms, guidelines, and templates required for tender applications and submissions in Finland

Explore Procurement Documents for Finland


Want To Bid in This Tender?

Get Local Agent Support in Finland and 60 More Countries.

View All The Services


View Tenders By


Publish Tenders


Have Any Dispute With The Purchaser?