Login
Register
Complete Your Profile
Change Password
Request a Password Reset
Download Documents
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES has floated a tender for Integrated Humanitarian Assistance for IDPs & Other Vulnerable Populations. The project location is USA and the tender is closing on 22 May 2019. The tender notice number is , while the TOT Ref Number is 33052226. Bidders can have further information about the Tender and can request the complete Tender document by Registering on the site.
Procurement Summary
Country : USA
Summary : Integrated Humanitarian Assistance for IDPs & Other Vulnerable Populations
Deadline : 22 May 2019
Other Information
Notice Type : Tender
TOT Ref.No.: 33052226
Document Ref. No. :
Competition : ICB
Financier : Other Funding Agencies
Purchaser Ownership : -
Tender Value : Refer Document
Purchaser's Detail
Purchaser : CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES
228 W. Lexington St. Baltimore, Maryland,
Tel : +1- 888-277-7575
USA
URL :https://www.crs.org
Tender Details
Tenders are invited for Somalia: Evaluation Terms of Reference: Integrated Humanitarian Assistance for IDPs & Other Vulnerable Populations in South Central Somalia: Final Evaluation
I. INTRODUCTION
I.A. Evaluation Overview
Catholic Relief Services Somalia is seeking to engage an external consult to conduct a final evaluation for the Integrated Humanitarian Assistance for IDPs & Other Vulnerable Populations in South Central Somalia program. The aim of the evaluation is to determine the overall merit and value of the response through using meta-questions to assess the project-s relevance, effectiveness, and efficiency as well as to provide evidence-based recommendations that will inform future programming.
Non-experimental evaluation design will be used to measure the changes brought about by the project intervention to the target beneficiaries in Mogadishu, Afgooye and Baidoa. Probability sampling will be used for the household quantitative survey to ensure the subjects of the population get an equal opportunity to be selected as respondents. Two stage stratified sampling approach will be used to select study participants. For the qualitative data, purposive sampling method will be used to select study respondents, based on the role they played in the emergency response.
Quantitative data collection will target beneficiary households in select project target locations in Mogadishu, Afgooye and Baidoa, that have benefited from the project interventions and will be designed to collect data from household heads and/or their spouses on demographic, socio-economic characteristics of the households and the performance of the selected indicators. The data will be collected using semi-structured household questionnaire through a mobile data collection application (such as CommCare).
Qualitative data collection will target the key stakeholders involved the project design and implementation. This information will be used to supplement and complement the quantitative data collected from the household interviews to provide an in-depth knowledge on how the intervention has been able to support conflict and drought-affected IDPs in the project target locations. The targeted respondents will include the health centers staff, village committee members, representatives of the community and the other project staff involved in the implementation of the response. The qualitative data collection will be done through Focus Group Discussions (FGDs), Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) and through site observations of health centers, protection centers and water points.
I.B. Background: CRS and Implementing Partners
Catholic Relief Services (CRS) - An international non-governmental organization supporting relief and development work in over 99 countries around the world. CRS programs assist persons based on need, regardless of creed, ethnicity or nationality and works through local church and non-church partners to implement programs. CRS carries out the commitment of the Bishops of the United States to assist the poor and vulnerable overseas. CRS currently addresses food, water, hygiene, health, nutrition, and protection needs of vulnerable Somalis. CRS has been working closely with and channeling resources and support to local organizations inside Somalia since the 1990s. CRS has been implementing activities in Mogadishu since August 2011, in Baidoa since April 2012, and in Gedo region since 2014 with OFDA, FFP, and other private and external donor funding.
SOS Children-s Villages International - An independent, non-governmental international development organization which has been working to meet the needs and protect the interests and rights of children since 1949. SOS in Somalia began in 1983; and a property provided by the government was chosen as the site for the first SOS Children's Village and its adjoining kindergarten. The SOS School was later converted into an emergency clinic during the war, and the mother and child clinic became part of emergency relief programming. Today it remains the only functioning maternity ward and gynecological care facility in the country. More recently, the SOS Vocational Training Center was established, which offers training courses for nurses and midwives. SOS has worked with CRS since 2011 on emergency programs to provide livelihood recovery, basic health, and nutrition services to vulnerable IDPs and host communities.
Save Somali Women and Children (SSWC) - SSWC was founded in 1992 by a group of Somali female intellectuals from a cross section of the community and has a longstanding history of promoting women-s rights and advocacy. SSWC has worked in the areas of protection, WASH, and livelihoods, and prioritizes supporting grassroots economic projects for women, enhancing their capacity for advocacy on the issue of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), providing training to Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and Community Based Organizations (CBOs) on women-s rights, and raising awareness on the conditions of women and girls in Somalia in Baidoa, Mogadishu, Afgooye, Caadado, Dsamareeb and Kismayu.
Trocaire - Trocaire is an international non-governmental organization that works with local partners to support communities in over 20 developing countries with a focus on food and resource rights, women's empowerment and humanitarian response. Trocaire has been operational in Somalia since 1992 and is one of the few organizations that continued to provide life-saving interventions without pause throughout the chaotic decades of civil war. Trocaire employs a unique, community led approach through all its work that has ensured access and safety for its staff and operations.
I.C. Background: Project Goal and Objectives
Catholic Relief Services received a grant valued at $5, 999, 995 from OFDA/USAID to carry out humanitarian assistance for IDPs and host populations in South-Central Somalia. The project start date was July 23rd, 2018 and the project will end on July 2nd, 2019. The project provides an integrated package of life-saving services to highly vulnerable IDPs, host-communities and hard-to-reach populations in Mogadishu, Afgooye Corridor, Baidoa, Cadaado, Luuq, Dollow, and Garbahaarrey. CRS works with three implementing partners: Save Somalia Women and Children (SSWC), SOS Children-s Villages Somalia (SOS), and Trocaire Somalia. The project intended to reach a total of
150, 000 beneficiaries, including 127, 500 (85%) IDPs. The project has five objectives:
1. Target populations access comprehensive primary care and have reduced morbidity.
2. Malnutrition in young children (5) and pregnant/lactating women (PLWs) is decreased and prevented.
3. Vulnerable groups are less at risk and survivors of GBV access comprehensive services.
4. Vulnerable populations are adequately protected through coordinated settlement.
5. Vulnerable populations access clean water and have improved hygiene.
The project goal, sectors, objectives by sector, and activities are presented in the table below:
Goal: Displaced and other vulnerable populations have reduced malnutrition, morbidity and protection risks.
Sector and Health Nutrition Protection Settlements WASH
Amount $843, 791 $971, 071 $2, 970, 636 $393, 640 $840, 857
Target Malnutrition in Vulnerable groups Vulnerable Vulnerable
populations young children (0- are less at risk populations are populations
access 5) and and survivors of adequately access clean
Objective comprehensive pregnant/lactating GBV access protected water and have
primary care women is comprehensive through improved
and have decreased and services. coordinated hygiene.
reduced prevented. settlement.
morbidity.
CRS and its CRS and its CRS and its CRS works CRS and its
partners partners use the partners work closely with the partners
support static Basic Nutrition within prevention Somalia CCCM undertake
and mobile Service Package and response to cluster to extensive
health clinics, for Somalia gender-based enhance hygiene
who use protocol (as violence and child humanitarian promotion
mobile recommended by protection and coordination, campaigns,
outreach the Somalia psychosocial strengthen the integrated with
teams to Nutrition Cluster). support services capacity of nutrition
extend service CRS uses a to achieve this community and messaging at
provision to combination of objective. GBV camp facilities and HH
hard to reach strategies to survivors access management level through
IDP decrease comprehensive committees and leveraging
populations malnutrition, services including improve partner
who cannot including medical, legal and acceptance networks of
easily access household level psycho-social. among host CHWs and
Approach existing screening, Furthermore, the communities CNWs to
facilities. treatment at project works to and local delivery
health facilities, raise GBV authorities. integrated
IYCF and mother- awareness and hygiene
to-mother mitigation messaging.
support groups strategies among Furthermore,
and targeted target the project
nutrition communities. supports the
messaging. Partners also construction of
participate in latrines,
child protection handwashing
through the stations and
provision of child shallow wells to
friendly spaces benefit both
(CFS). IDP and host
community
populations.
3
Table 1: Target beneficiaries in each location.
District
Host Community
IDP Beneficiaries
Beneficiaries Reached
Reached to Date
to Date community
Afgooye
49, 305
69, 768
Luuq
8, 474
11, 991
Baidoa
19, 260
27, 253
Total
77, 039
109, 012
II. PURPOSE OF THE EVALUATION
II.A. Purpose of the Evaluation
The purpose of the evaluation is to assess whether the response achieved the desired outcomes and produced evidence-based recommendations to inform future programming. The evaluation will seek to:
• Determine achievement against performance of select indicators;
• Identify program strategies, structures, systems and interventions that contributed to or impeded the achievement of intended impact of program interventions;
• Draw lessons from the project and results achieved to inform future similar programming.
II.B. Key Audiences and Uses
STAKEHOLDERS
STAKEHOLDER EVALUATION DATA
STAKEHOLDERS- ROLE IN THE
JUSTIFICATION
NEEDS AND USE
EVALUATION
FOR
STAKEHOLDER
ROLE
• To establish the impact of the
• Provision of funds to undertake the
This is the donor
OFDA project on the target
evaluation.
for the project.
USAID/OFDA
•
beneficiaries.
• Review and approval of the evaluation
Suggestions/recommendations
TOR and report.
with the potential to shape
future programming.
• To establish the impact of
• Development of the evaluation TOR.
This is the
OFDA on the target
• Recruitment of the consultant.
project prime.
•
beneficiaries.
• Reviewing and approval of the
Suggestions/recommendations
evaluation design and tools upon
with the potential to shape
agreement with the consultant.
future programming.
• Provision of relevant project
• To assess and evaluate the
background materials.
CRS
relevance, efficiency, and
• Supervision of the consultant.
effectiveness of the response
• Review and approval of the final the
interventions in terms of its
evaluation report.
implementation approach and
• Processing payments for the
strategies.
consultant(s) upon receiving of the
final Report.
• Make travel, accommodation and per
diem arrangements for consultant and
team.
4
• Ensure smooth flow of consultancy
engagement processes including
contractual obligations.
• Share the final evaluation report with
all key stakeholders, including key
project staff, partners, donor
representative and government.
• To measure the outcome and
• Assist the consultant in the
These are the
impact of the intervention.
implementation of the evaluation
project sub-
Local
• Suggestions/recommendations
methodology as appropriate i.e.
grantees.
Implementing
with the potential to shape
recruitment of research assistants,
Partners: SOS,
future programming.
participation in sampling, mobilizing
SSWC and
sampled communities, scheduling
Trocaire
meetings, interviews, etc.
• Timely procurement of logistics as
agreed with the consultant.
III. EVALUATION QUESTIONS / OBJECTIVES
The evaluation will use meta-questions around relevance, effectiveness, and efficiency of project interventions, in assessing whether the project met. These evaluation meta-questions are provided in the table below.
COMPONENTS OF
QUESTIONS WE HAVE
EXISTING DATA
FURTHER DATA
WHO SHOULD BE
THE PROGRAM
THAT WE WOULD LIKE
TO HELP
NEEDED
INVOLVED?
WE WOULD LIKE
ANSWERED
ANALYZE THIS
TO LEARN MORE
QUESTION
ABOUT
To what degree did the
•
Project
•
Beneficiary and
CRS, SOS, SSWC,
project meet the needs of
proposal
other stakeholder
Trocaire, beneficiaries
target beneficiary
•
Project
perspectives on
and other relevant
populations?
monthly and
the relevance of
stakeholders
Relevance
quarterly
the project in
reports
meeting their
•
Feedback
needs.
mechanism
data
To what extent were the
•
Project
•
Population level
CRS, SOS, SSWC,
sector specific objectives of
proposal
data on required
Trocaire, beneficiaries
the project achieved?
•
Project
performance
and other relevant
monthly and
indicators
stakeholders
To what extent were
quarterly
(detailed in
beneficiaries actively
reports,
•
tabled 2 below)
consulted and engaged in
including FGD
Feedback from
Effectiveness
the project especially in
reports
beneficiaries
their ability to provide
•
Feedback
regarding
feedback through partner-s
mechanism
awareness,
accountability
data, including
accessibility and
mechanisms?
design
use of
documentation
accountability
of mechanisms
mechanisms
5
•
Previous donor
•
Beneficiary
submitted
feedback
reports
regarding project
•
Partner
outputs,
indicator
outcomes and
tracking tables
community
•
CRS partner
consultation
accountability
around the
assessment
project
documents
•
implementation
Analysis of
project
performance
against indicator
targets and
changes from the
baseline
To what extent did the
•
Project
•
Feedback from
CRS, SOS, SSWC,
implementation process,
proposal
both CRS and
Trocaire, beneficiaries
including delivery options
•
Project
•
partner staff
and other relevant
and models, ensure
monthly and
Feedback from
stakeholders
efficient use of value for
quarterly
•
key stakeholders
money; including:
reports,
Analysis of
Efficiency
management structures,
•
including FGDs
qualitative and
partner roles and
Monitoring
quantitative data
coordination, humanitarian
visit and
regarding
coordination between
meeting
implementation
other actors?
documentation
process against
project
effectiveness
Table 2: Performance indicators.
Below is the list of required indicators, baseline benchmarks and end of targets to be measured by the evaluation:
OBJECTIVE
INDICATORS
BASELINE
TARGET
STATEMENT
VALUE
Target populations
1. Number and percentage of community members who can recall
1.
0
1.
75%
access comprehensive
target health education message
2.
46.8%
2.
35%
primary care and have
% of HH that report they had at least one sick person in last two
3.
60.4%
3.
75%
reduced morbidity.
weeks
% of pregnant women who reported to have accessed/used
formal healthcare services in last 3 months
Malnutrition in young
Proportion of infants 0-5 months of age who are fed exclusively
4.
27.61%
4.
25%
children (0-5) and
with breast milk
5.
10.38%
5.
25%
pregnant/lactating
5. Proportion of children 6-23 months of age who receive foods
6.
N/A
6.
N/A
women is decreased
from 4 or more food groups
and prevented.
% children (6 to 59 months) with MUAC score below 125mm
6
Vulnerable groups are
7. Percentage of targeted children reporting an improvement in
0
75%
less at risk and
their sense of safety and well-being at the close of the program
0
72%
survivors of GBV access
8. Percentage of people reporting improvements in their feelings
39.5%
50%
comprehensive
of well-being and ability to cope at the end of the program (CRS
services.
custom)
% of HH that are aware of where to access GBV/protection
services
Vulnerable populations
10.
Percentage of settlement (neighborhood) beneficiaries who
10.
N/A
10.
70%
are adequately
believe settlement (neighborhood) activities met or exceeded
11.
N/A
11.
80%
protected through
expectations
coordinated
11.
Beneficiaries as a percentage of the total number of
settlement.
settlements (neighbourhood) residents
Vulnerable populations
12.
Percent of people targeted by the hygiene promotion program
12.
71.10%
12.
70%
access clean water and
who know at least three (3) of the five (5) critical times to wash
13.
17.10%
13.
70%
have improved
hands
14.
0
14.
5, 000
hygiene.
13.
Percent of households targeted by the hygiene promotion
15.
N/A
15.
36
program who store their drinking water safely in clean
16.
0
16.
3, 600
containers
17.
0
17.
7.5
14.
Number of people directly utilizing improved sanitation
18.
0
18.
95%
services provided with OFDA funding
19.
47%
19.
80%
15.
Average number of users per functioning toilet
20.
0
20.
70%
16.
Number of people directly utilizing improved water services
21.
0
21.
70%
provided with OFDA funding
22.
0
22.
70%
17.
Estimated safe water supplied per beneficiary in
litres/person/day
18.
Percent of handwashing stations built or rehabilitated in health
facilities that are functional
19.
Percent of households targeted by WASH program that are
collecting all water for drinking, cooking, and hygiene from
improved water sources
20.
Percent of households reporting satisfaction with the contents
of the WASH NFIs received through direct distribution (i.e. kits)
or voucher
21.
Percent of households reporting satisfaction with the quantity
of WASH NFIs received through direct distribution (i.e. kits),
vouchers, or cash
22.
Percent of households reporting satisfaction with the quality of
WASH NFIs received through direct distribution (i.e. kits),
vouchers, or cash
IV. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY
IV.A. Evaluation Design and Approach
The final evaluation will employ a non-experimental design for simple pre-post comparison of results using a mixed-methods approach involving both quantitative and qualitative data. Data collection will involve a quantitative beneficiary household survey; document reviews, including routine monitoring data and project reports; beneficiary and stakeholder interviews, field observations, and post-evaluation workshop and discussions. The consultant will use a comparative analysis approach to report on project achievements for selected indicator values.
7
Quantitative HH survey will be conducted through structured questionnaire, with relevant and appropriate questions, that will generate quantitative information that will be captured numerically and can produce summary statistics such as frequency distributions, means, medians, ranges and other measures of variation which describe the beneficiary in an aggregate way. The quantitative HH survey will be complemented by qualitative methods that will be conducted alongside the HH survey in the form of key informant interviews (KII), focus group discussions (FGD) and site observations. Secondary data from routine project MEAL system and the previous phase final evaluation and need assessments KAP surveys conducted in the project should also be used to inform the findings, conclusions, and recommendations in this evaluation. The survey will generate end-line data for the outcome indicators of the OFDA project, which could be used as baseline data for follow-on program where appropriate. In this design, the researcher will not control, manipulate or alter the predictor variables or project beneficiaries, but will instead rely on interpretation, observation and interactions to concluded, through correlations.
IV.B. Sources of Data and Data Collection Methods
In order to answer the key evaluation questions associated with this assignment, both qualitative and quantitative data will be elicited by the consultant, through primary and secondary sources. First, the evaluation will assess and draw from on secondary data, which will be obtained through review of key project documents: quarterly assessments, monthly reports, monitoring data and project proposals. The evaluation will also generate primary data. The consultant will design and conduct a household survey, administered to randomly selected beneficiaries in the target locations, to generate primary quantitative data.
Finally, in order to generate primary qualitative data, the consultant will conduct beneficiary focus group discussions, key informant interviews, and any other methods considered appropriate, such as case studies and most significant change stories. Participants of focus group discussions and key informant interviews will be purposively selected from project beneficiary and project stakeholder populations. The consultant will conduct key informant interview with SOS, SSWC, Trocaire, and CRS Somalia staff, as well as other key project stakeholders. Focus group discussion sessions, composed of 8-12 (men, women and child) project beneficiaries will be undertaken in the IDPs and the host communities; the groups will be gender-mixed or gender-segregated, as deemed appropriate by the evaluators. Distinct FGD guides will be developed for IDPs and host communities, to elicit data on ‘why- and -how- the differences and/or similarities in the project performance indicators in the two strata have occurred and to establish suggestions to improve future project design. All qualitative data will be recorded during the FGDs and during the informant interview process, translated from Somali to English, as needed, and recorded in MS-word. The consultant should include all raw qualitative focus group discussion and key informant interview data, as appendices to the Final Report, and categorize, summarize, interpret, and highlight key findings and conclusions from all this data in the Final Report itself.
All of the qualitative data collected through the above methods will be used to triangulate, explain, and create context for the trends and data collected through the quantitative methods. In the Final Evaluation Report, the analysis of all data (primary, secondary, quantitative, qualitative) and findings should be organized around and presented in order to answer the four key Evaluation Questions (below).
EVALUATION
KEY DATA TO BE
SOURCE OF DATA
DATA COLLECTION
SAMPLING
QUESTIONS
COLLECTED TO ANSWER
(FROM WHOM /
METHODS AND
METHODS /
THE EVALUATION
WHAT WILL THE
FREQUENCY
SAMPLE
QUESTION
DATA BE
(HOW WILL YOU
SIZE
(WHAT DATA WILL YOU
COLLECTED?)
COLLECT THE DATA
COLLECT?)
AND HOW OFTEN?)
To what degree did
Percentage of beneficiaries
Individual households
Household
Stratified
the project meet the
who report that the project
within the target areas
questionnaire
sampling for
needs of beneficiary
was successful in meeting their
(including IDPs and host
household
needs. (Disaggregated by
communities)
FGDs and KIIS with
questionnaire
populations?
service received)
beneficiaries
8
Beneficiaries utilizing
(Disaggregated by
Purposive
Percentage of beneficiaries
services (i.e. health
service received)
sampling for
who express satisfaction of
beneficiaries at clinics,
key informant
services provided by the
protection beneficiaries
interviews
project. (Disaggregated by
at GBV centers and CFS,
and focus
service received)
etc.)
group
discussions
Additional feedback from
Community leaders,
beneficiaries regarding the
village and camp
relevance of project activities,
committees
how well those
activities/outputs met their
needs, etc.
To what extent were
*All performance indicators
Individual households
Household
Stratified
the sector specific
from table 2 (above)
within the target areas
questionnaire
sampling for
objectives of the project
(including IDPs and host
household
communities)
FGDs and KIIS with
questionnaire
achieved?
beneficiaries
Beneficiaries utilizing
services (i.e. health
Purposive
beneficiaries at clinics,
sampling for
protection beneficiaries
key informant
at GBV centers and CFS,
interviews
etc.)
and focus
group
Community leaders,
discussions
village and camp
committees
Project indicator
database/indicator
performance tracking
tables including the
baseline evaluation
To what extent were
Percentage of beneficiaries
Individual households
Household
Stratified
beneficiaries actively
who were aware of how
within the target areas
questionnaire.
sampling for
consulted and engaged
existing accountability
(including IDPs and host
household
communities)
FGDs and KIIS with
questionnaire
in the project especially
mechanisms (Disaggregated
beneficiaries
in their ability to provide
by partner)
Beneficiaries utilizing
feedback through
Percentage of beneficiaries
services (i.e. health
Purposive
project partner-s
beneficiaries at clinics,
sampling for
who reported they were able
accountability
protection beneficiaries
key informant
to access these mechanisms
mechanisms?
at GBV centers and CFS,
interviews
(Disaggregated by partner)
etc.)
and focus
Percentage of beneficiaries
group
Community leaders,
discussions
who used an accountability
village and camp
mechanism, to provide
committees
feedback or complaints, who
were satisfied with the ease of
using the mechanism
(Disaggregated by partner)
Percentage of beneficiaries
who used an accountability
mechanism, to provide
feedback or complaints, who
9
were satisfied with the
response they received
(Disaggregated by partner)
Additional feedback from
beneficiaries regarding
preferences for reporting
feedback and complaints, and
how they were sensitized (if at
all) to the existence and use of
accountability mechanisms.
4.To what extent did the
Perspectives of
CRS staff
KIIS with CRS and local
Purposive
implementation process,
stakeholders and analysis of
implementing partner
sampling for
including delivery
existing project
SSWC, SOS and
staff
key informant
interviews
options and models,
documentation
Trocaire staff
and focus
ensure efficient use of
group
value for money;
Feedback from project
discussions,
including: management
stakeholders around what
especially
structures, partner roles
worked well and what
amongst CRS
and coordination,
didn-t
and partner
humanitarian
implementing
coordination between
staff and host
other actors?
country
stakeholders
IV.C. Sampling Strategy
The beneficiary-based survey will employ stratified two stage cluster sampling design for household quantitative survey respondents. Each district will serve as the primary stratum for the evaluation. The first stage of sampling will involve a cluster sampling design with Probability Proportional to Size (PPS) sampling to sample villages/IDPs (clusters) within each district, that will serve as the primary units for the survey. In each village/IDPs a sample will be drawn independently using the existing survey parameters for the project indicators. A systematic random sampling methodology will be used to select households in each IDP camp/village. In each location, a landmark such as will be selected as a starting point and spin the pen technique used to determine the direction in which to move. Every nth household in the selected direction will be picked until all targeted households are interviewed. The consultant will further advise on the sampling criteria.
Sampling Size Calculation
n = D [(Z + Z )2 * (P**1**(1-P**1**) +P**2**(1-P**2**))/(P**2**-P**1**) 2]
The Cochran-s sample determination formula for comparative studies will be used on the following performance indicators:
• Number and percentage of community members who can recall target health education message
• Proportion of infants 0-5 months of age who are fed exclusively with breast milk
• Proportion of children 6-23 months of age who receive foods from 4 or more food groups
• Percentage of targeted children reporting an improvement in their sense of safety and well-being at the close of the program
10
• Percentage of people reporting improvements in their feelings of well-being and ability to cope at the end of the program
• Percentage of settlement (neighborhood) beneficiaries who believe settlement (neighborhood) activities met or exceeded expectations
• Beneficiaries as a percentage of the total number of settlements (neighborhood) residents
• Percent of people targeted by the hygiene promotion program who know at least three (3) of the five (5) critical times to wash hands
• Percent of households targeted by the hygiene promotion program who store their drinking water safely in clean containers
• Percent of handwashing stations built or rehabilitated in health facilities that are functional
• Percent of households targeted by WASH program that are collecting all water for drinking, cooking, and hygiene from improved water sources
• Percent of households reporting satisfaction with the contents of the WASH NFIs received through direct distribution (i.e. kits) or voucher
• Percent of households reporting satisfaction with the quantity of WASH NFIs received through direct distribution (i.e. kits), vouchers, or cash
• Percent of households reporting satisfaction with the quality of WASH NFIs received through direct distribution (i.e. kits), vouchers, or cash
• % of pregnant women who reported to have accessed/used formal healthcare services in last 3 months
• % of HH that report they had at least one sick person in last two weeks
• % children (6 to 59 months) with MUAC score below 125mm
• % of HH that are aware of where to access GBV/protection services
IV.D. Data Analysis Procedures
The study proposes to collect data using household questionnaire coded in mobile application. Upon data cleaning and organizing data will be exported into Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for analysis. Descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages, means, standard deviation and medians) will be used to describe the evaluation findings on the project indicators.
Qualitative data, obtained using FGDs and KII will be captured using FGD and KII guides, translated into English and later typed in Microsoft word templates. Analysis for this data will be mainly through content analysis and establishment of themes. The findings from qualitative data will be used to triangulate the primary quantitative data and secondary data (from project documents and performance reports) for the final conclusions of the evaluation findings.
V. EVALUATION TEAM
Evaluation (Lead) Consultant: Will plan and coordinate data collection, review data, analyse it and prepare a high-quality report.
Reports to Somalia MEAL Manager
Key working relations: Somalia MEAL Manager, Somalia Emergency Coordinator, Somalia Program Managers, Somalia Country Manager
Key Responsibilities
? Develop an inception report, detailing the agreed upon study design, methodology, indicators, data- gathering tools, work plan schedule and budget to carry out the assignment, in consultation with CRS.
Desired Qualifications and abilities
? A minimum educational qualification of a master-s degree in Emergency response, Agriculture, Social Sciences, Economics or relevant field from recognized university
11
? Conduct desk?review of relevant project documents
? Must have a proven research experience in the Somalia
and secondary data on child protection
context.
? Develop quantitative and qualitative data gathering
? Has undertaken similar evaluations in the past 2 years
tools in consultation with CRS
in Somalia. This includes demonstrated ability to
? Plan and coordinate quantitative and qualitative data
manage field procedures in the evaluation area.
collection
? Previous evaluation experience for a USAID project is
? Conduct training for the data collection teams including
an added advantage.
pre?testing of data collection tools
? Solid experience in qualitative and quantitative studies.
? Work with the project management team in evaluation
? Experienced in use of ICT4D solutions in data gathering.
planning and logistics
? Computer proficiency with good knowledge of MS
? Organize and facilitate team interaction
office (Word, Excel, PowerPoint) and SPSS.
? Provide support to evaluation team members to fulfil
? Excellent analytical and report writing skills ? Excellent
their obligations
written and spoken English and Somali will be an added
? Conduct Key Informant Interviews
advantage
? Review, clean and analyse data collected
? Excellent communication and interpersonal skills
? Write report on the findings and recommendations
? Excellent time management skills
? Present preliminary findings to project stakeholders for
? Ability to work promptly and accurately, and pay
validation
attention to detail
?
Incorporate input from project stakeholders and
? Ability to work well both independently and in a team
submit final report
? Available to be engaged during the entire survey period
? Carry out or assist in additional duties assigned by the
project staff
Field Supervisors: Will take part in enumerator training, guide and supervise data collection
Report to Lead Consultant
Key responsibilities
Desired Qualifications and abilities
? Obtain sampling lists for each area in which his/her
?
Familiarity with the Somalia context (Baidoa,
team will be working
Mogadishu and Afgooye districts)
?
Assign work to enumerators.
? Fluency in written and spoken Somali and English
?
Maintain fieldwork control sheets and make sure
? Experienced in team management.
assignments are carried out
? Familiarity with data collection on mobile technologies
? Communicate any problems to the Lead Consultant
?
Understands surveys ethics and protocols.
and/or project staff
?
Understanding of data confidentiality issues.
? Try to develop a positive team spirit
? Excellent verbal and written communication skills in
? Conduct regular spot-checks and re-interviews
English and Somali
? Conduct regular review sessions with each enumerator
? Ability to work with minimum supervision
? Receive data from enumerators (questionnaires, focus
? Excellent communication and interpersonal skills
group guides etc.) at the end of each day
?
Ability to multitask
? Produce a summary observation report detailing daily
? Social Perceptiveness- Aware of other reactions and
achievements, general observations, challenges and
understands them
summary findings/ emerging themes.
? Ability to work quickly and accurately, and pay
? Oversee entry of data into established data entry
attention to detail
templates as necessary by team members at the end of
? Ability to work well both independently and in a team ?
each data collection day
Available to be engaged during the entire survey
? Ensure that all evaluation procedures and protocols are
period.
followed
? Carrying out or assist in additional duties assigned by
the Lead Consultant
Enumerators: Will administer questionnaires to respondent
Report to the Field Supervisors.
? Locate households and identify respondents
Desired Qualifications and Abilities
12
? Explain
survey and/or
focus
group
objectives
and
?
Minimum secondary education
procedures to interviewees
?
Prior experience conducting data collection for
? Ask questions in accordance with instructions to obtain
government programs and/or international NGOs in
various specified information
Somalia
? Interpret
questions
to
help
interviewees'
?
Excellent verbal and written communication skills in
comprehension
English and Somali
?
Identify and resolve inconsistencies in interviewees'
? Familiarity with mobile data collection technologies is
responses by means of appropriate questioning and/or
preferred
explanation
? Understands survey protocols and ethics.
? Review data obtained from interview for completeness
?
Fluent in English and Somali language
and accuracy.
?
Familiarity with Afgooye, Baidoa and Mogadishu
? Identify and report problems in obtaining valid data
districts geography
? Produce
a
daily
observation
report
detailing
daily
? Must be in possession of a smartphone
achievements, general observations, challenges and
? Excellent communication and interpersonal skills
summary findings/emerging themes.
? Social perceptiveness- Aware of other reactions and
? Make and honor appointments made with respondents
understands them
in cases where the respondent was not available for
?
Excellent time management skills
interview
? Ability to work quickly and accurately, and pay
? Meet
with
supervisor
daily
to
submit completed
attention to detail
assignments and discuss progress
? Ability to work well both independently and in a team
?
Carry out or assist in the additional procedures for data
? Respectful and friendly in all interactions
collection, as requested by the field supervisor
? Available to be engaged during the entire survey period
Role of CRS
Role of Implementing Partners
? Recruit external consultant for the evaluation
? Provide sample frames from which respondents for the
?
Provide consultant with background documents,
quantitative data will be drawn
reports and available secondary data for review
? Assist in the identification, contacting and locating of
? Make
travel,
accommodation
and
per-diem
project beneficiaries and stakeholders
arrangements for consultant and team
? Support recruitment of enumerators
? Oversee
the
recruitment
of
enumerators
by
the
? Conduct community sensitization and mobilization of
implementing partner
respondents
? Provide oversight for the data collection
? Participate in the validation workshop
? Review
and
provide
input
on
the
consultant-s
deliverables
? Organize validation workshop for the presentation of
preliminary findings to the project stakeholders
? Ensure
smooth
flow
of
consultancy
engagement
processes including contractual obligations
? Share
the
final
evaluation
report
with
all
key
stakeholders, including key project staff, partners,
donor representative and government
VI.REPORTING AND DISSEMINATION PLAN
VI.A. Evaluation Report
The consultant must submit two bound copies and a soft copy of the final evaluation report which is expected to be within 40 pages (without annexes) and with the following components:
? Preliminary Pages (Title page, Table of Contents including a list of annexes, Acknowledgement, Executive Summary, List of Acronyms and Abbreviations, Definition of Terms and Concepts)
13
? Introduction describing the project-s background and context, a description of the program, including the results framework and theory of change
? Purpose and Objectives of Evaluation
? Key evaluation questions (or objectives) and a statement of the scope of the evaluation
? An overview of the evaluation approach, methodology and data sources, as well as limitations and delimitations of the evaluation itself
? Evaluation findings, organized around the four key Evaluation Questions
? Conclusions based on evaluation findings, organized around the four key Evaluation Questions
? Lessons learned based on the evaluation findings
? Recommendations based on evaluation findings, organized by audience: 1.) Donor/OFDA and 2.) CRS and its LIPs, as well as future Implementing Partners, etc.
? Appendices (including all data collection tools, respondent lists, raw data collected, data analysis files, etc)
VI.B. Dissemination Plan
STAKEHOLDER/
KEY FINDINGS
CHANNEL(S) OF
PRODUCT(S) TO SHARE
AUDIENCE
COMMUNICATION
USAID/OFDA
•
To establish the impact of the
•
Email
•
Evaluation report
project components on the target
communication
beneficiaries.
•
Suggestions/recommendations with
the potential to shape future
programming.
CRS and local
•
To establish the impact of the
•
Email
•
Evaluation Report
implementing
project component on the target
communication
partners (LIPs)
•
beneficiaries.
•
Dissemination and
Suggestions/recommendations with
reflection meeting
the potential to shape future
programming
•
To assess and evaluate effectiveness
of the response interventions in
terms of its implementation
approach and strategies
VII. SCHEDULE AND LOGISTICS
The consultant should prepare a detailed workplan document, in which he/she describes the evaluation-s overall schedule (i.e., duration, phasing, timing) as well as work hours, required preparation work, conditions that might affect data collection, meeting-arranging procedures, and needed and available office space, cars, equipment, and local services (e.g., interviewers).
VIII. DELIVERABLES AND TIMELINE
The following items will be expected to be delivered during implementation, analysis, and reporting on the evaluation:
• A detailed workplan, with target dates and deliverables identified and highlighted
• All data collection tools
• Sampling guidance and sample, as well as list of participants for FGDs and KIIs
• Cleaned quantitative dataset (for quantitative data collection methods)
• Related codebooks, and data analysis files (SPSS syntax files)
14
• FGD score sheets/reports/recordings and key informant interview forms/ reports (MS word)
• All photos and field notes with quotation from beneficiary verbatim
• The final report shall be submitted in 3 hard and 1 soft copies.
DELIVERABLES
ESTIMATED NUMBER
TARGET DATES TO
OF DAYS NEEDED TO
COMPLETE
COMPLETE
Initial meeting between CRS and the consultant to agree on
1
June 3rd 2019
the evaluation methodology and data collection tools
Consultant creates a detailed workplan as a deliverable which
1
June 4thth, 2019
CRS will review and approve
Review of project documents and submission of an inception
2
June 6thth, 2019
report with all data collection tools and guidance)
Inception meeting
1
June 7thth, 2019
Revision of the inception report and data collection tools by
2
June 11th, 2019
the consultant based on feedback provided by CRS
Translation of data collection tools
1
June 12th 2019
Coding of tools into the mobile data gathering platform.
1
June 13st, 2019
Travel from Nairobi- Mogadishu-Baidoa by the evaluation
2
June 15th, 2019
team.
Training for enumerators (including pretest)
3
June 19th, 2019
Data collection (Qualitative and quantitative concurrently)
5
June 26, 2019
Translation of qualitative data done at the end of the focus
group session and typed into MS-word).
Travel from Baidoa -Mogadishu - Nairobi.
2
June 28th, 2019
Data cleaning and analysis with submission of data tables and
8
June 8h, 2019
syntax files and preliminary report.
Draft report submitted.
1
July 9th, 2019
Results dissemination meeting.
1
July 10th, 2019
Final report submitted to CRS with Datasets (or recordings and
1
July 11h, 2019
transcripts/notes), codebooks, syntax or do files submitted),
with all CRS feedback (on Draft Report) addressed
Total consultant engagement days (Estimated)
32 days
IX. BUDGET
CRS will provide for the following costs for the consultant team: international and-in country travel, visa costs, payment for translators, data collectors, data processors (as needed), and secretarial services; equipment, etc. CRS will procure the consultant services based on a competitive daily rate.
X. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
The below ethical considerations will be adhered to during the evaluation process:
i.) The evaluation will be conducted by an independent and impartial external evaluator.
ii.) Quantitative data will be obtained from a randomly selected representative sample.
iii.) Participation in the survey will be voluntary.
iv.) Anonymity, confidentiality and safeguarding of survey data will be guaranteed.
v.) There will be no risks and benefits for individual participants
15
vi.) The culture, norms and traditions of study populations will be respected.
vii.) Consent will be sought prior to commencing data gathering
viii.) Views and Opinions of the different survey subjects will be respected.
ix.) Comply with USAID evaluation procedures by ensuring external consultant has been listed under Section 1.4.b.2.B
of your award entitled "Sub-Award, Transfer, or Contracting Out of Any Work"
XX. Key evaluation compliance requirements
See the USAID evaluation policy (https://www.usaid.gov/evaluation/policy) and CRS - MEAL policies and procedures (available on request).
XXX. QUOTATION REQUIREMENTS
Interested applicants to send a technical and financial proposal for the work in line with the following guidance:
? Capability statement: How the consultant or firm is structured for the assignment, the role each staff will play including the CVs of the key personnel who will take part in the consultancy
? Technical Proposal: The consultant-s understanding and interpretation of the Terms of Reference (TOR), a detailed methodology and plan on how the data collection and analysis will be done and detailed implementation schedule for the evaluation.
? Financial proposal: Itemized budget proposal that should include the consultancy fees and operational costs.
? References: Names, addresses, telephone numbers of three organizations that you have conducted evaluations for within the last three years, that will act as professional referees
? Evaluation reports: Final reports for the evaluations conducted for the three reference organizations provided
Documents
Want To Bid in This Tender?
Get Local Agent Support in USA and 60 More Countries.
View Tenders By